Utah Airgun Hunting Laws

interviews Claims of benefits, future employees

A selection process has several stages.

• In which of them you think it necessary to consult on Benefits for a empledo in that company?

• we go to the first interview without knowing if you pay a year-end bonus?

• "We demand that without knowing the search contact us to ensure that working from home (WFH) is something the company promotes from admission?

I've found lately with some demands of this style. When I was a selector that performs processes for entering selected as employees of my clients, some candidates understand that there is confidential information that I can not share. Others are not.
With
logic and without going too far to the supply point, understand that in order to work from home, should have an initial period of the enterprise plugin / process / task. We could ask the same thing otherwise. The company may encourage the WFH but not necessarily granted to all profiles / projects / employees just entering.

I think the process should be given its end points and have the discretion to know who is a true partner at every stage, and the optimum stage to raise each of the concerns about the benefits they claim to have the employer's side.

remember the manager of the Argentina subsidiary a English company, tell me in an interview (he did the final interview) with a group of Juniors (people with no experience who would be trained for the task), one candidate said he would not say anything about your experience if he assured him that the company gave an annual bonus and wanted to know if that bonus targets were or were not reachable. The idea of \u200b\u200bmanagement was to comment on this issue, obviously once it had discussed other. His predisposition was different in the way of "demand" information. Story to story to be understood this post. Or your goal.


We have every right to enforce our time going to interviews. We should trust the person on the other hand, takes into account all the data we put in the mail we sent to the postulates (job objective, expectations, roles that we cover, being prevented from working in places / times for specific reasons personal / studio .. etc etc) to require an interview.

Asegurémosnos provide information of value in our mail and CV presentation.

should é, confident that if we indicate that our intended is a gross salary of 5000 pesos, they will not make us go through 4 interviews, to offer in the fifth after choosing a salary of 1000 pesos.


What I write sounds like a "logical" and someone might be thinking, "Mariana, you're exaggerating, but as this happens .. I would like to discuss it, put it on the table for the debate and ... ask if do you consider that you can meet the "by the book" a process in terms of expectations, or has become the market of HR in IT in a round that makes us be warned and required more details of this style, before agreeing to an interview?